Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
How can law firms ensure social media compliance? What are the rules and restrictions to creating profiles, publishing content and communicating with prospects and clients? This article answers these questions and provides tips to help firms create a sound social media policy.
Paid Facebook ads, YouTube video promotion, Twitter tweets — social media is one of the most important and effective channels in digital marketing today. Social media is a powerful platform to promote business, but it is important to establish certain policies and procedures, first.
There are restrictions and compliance rules that attorneys and law firms must follow. Among these are:
On social media, lawyers are allowed to publish information about their professional and personal lives. The latter often helps reflect human insight, which may have a positive effect on prospective clients. After all, individuals like to do business with others whom they know, like and trust.
When the firm decides to embark upon its social media journey, all campaigns must be ethically compliant from the start. The best way to achieve this is by creating a social media policy. The goal is to create a dynamic policy that encourages the use of this relatively new technology while avoiding institutionalizing a static policy with too many inflexible rules. See the ABA's guidance, “How to Create a Law Firm Social Media Policy.”
Consider implementing a pre-approval process for newly-created social media profiles. If the firm grants access to profiles for non-lawyer staff members, make it mandatory to assign an admin ID to each profile. In establishing a social media policy, also define rules for the use of your firm's logo for profile images and whether to include the firm name, address, phone number and website address.
The firm should establish specific guidelines for the type of content it allows. Influencing factors are professionalism, ethics and client and company representations. The prevailing question should be: What are the consequences of publishing this particular piece of information?
Social media is about relevance, flexibility and timeliness. The marketing department should propose a process by which to monitor and pre-approve content to avoid becoming stuck in endless rounds of approvals.
The firm's social media policy should be designed to evolve as regulatory requirements continue to change. It's important to stay current with the latest developments to ensure compliance at all times.
Social media has created unprecedented marketing opportunities for law firms and lawyers. By establishing a thoughtful social media policy and improving it over time, CMOs can ensure that their firms comply with the rules and restrictions for social media and realize its benefits, simultaneously.
*****
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?