Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Last year, the global firm Baker McKenzie launched a new initiative called “Whitespace Legal Collab.” On the 27th floor of their Toronto office on Bay Street, the global firm opened their doors to clients and leaders in business, government, academia and non-profit organizations to “address complex global challenges at the intersection of business, law and technology” according to their website. “Our Whitespace Legal Collab is part of our firm's wider effort to cultivate a new type of thinking when helping our clients develop solutions to complex challenges,” says Paul Rawlinson, the global chair of the firm.
Baker McKenzie's innovation project is one of several law firm initiatives that use a process called Design Thinking. While Design Thinking has become a staple topic in MBA programs and tech companies, it is just now showing up in law practice management circles.
With its beginnings at the Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford (known as the dSchool), Design Thinking has been used to create innovative products like the iPhone and services such as Fidelity's Estate Planning Tools. Design firm IDEO, and its founder Tim Brown, have helped make design thinking a popular management tool through their innovative projects, books and on-line classes.
So, what is Design Thinking? Design Thinking is a creative process for innovation. In the same way lawyers use a process for court preparation or engaging in business development, Design Thinking is a process with five distinct steps to develop a better way to deliver legal services or solve a challenging problem.The five steps are:
The outcome of design thinking is a user-centered solution that may have not been apparent beforehand. Both the designer and the user gain experience and commitment to the solution because both have invested in its development.
|Design Thinking has been used in many ways in the legal profession. For example, the Legal Design Lab (legaltechdesign.com) of Stanford University has been a leader in developing new models of access to the justice system. Law departments, such as Microsoft, have used LDT to develop new ways of automating legal contract processes. Law firms have used LDT to both improve internal processes, such as new matter intake and attorney orientation, as well as client-facing processes, such as reducing steps in a legal process and integrating alternative service providers into service delivery processes.
Of most interest to law firms and their clients, however, is how to re-design the delivery of legal services and improve the relationships between law firms and legal departments. Legal Design Thinking may be applied to develop new ways to combine human-centered design and technology to meet the ever-changing demands of the legal profession. For example, consider how LDT may be applied to:
Legal Design Thinking results in not only more creative and effective solutions, but also a closer relationship and collaboration between law firms and their clients, the legal departments.
|Design Thinking brings several mindsets that can be particularly helpful to law firms adapting to a VUCA world.
User Centric: Design Thinking focuses on the experience of the user, which can be either a client or someone in the law firm or legal department. Either way, firms can only benefit from gaining a more intimate understanding of what their clients are experiencing, their goals for efficiency and cost reduction and their operational challenges. Lawyers and staff need to have a “beginner's mindset” when observing and interviewing clients to learn how they can make their life easier and solve everyday problems that make legal work inefficient.
Iterative process: Design Thinking is a process of trial and error. Much like Agile Development in the software world, Design Thinking happens at a rapid pace, trying out new ideas with clients before they are fully baked. This will be a challenge for some lawyers and business professionals. However, the iterative process will result in better solutions and a closer relationship with the client.
Work in Diverse Teams: Interdisciplinary teams with people from different backgrounds, experience and perspectives will result in more creative and innovative solutions. The benefits of assembling senior team members from finance, marketing, development and IT together with lawyers, clients and outside experts to solve “wicked” problems are obvious.
How do you learn Legal Design Thinking? The best way to learn LDT is to do it. Like most leadership skills and management techniques, LDT takes hands-on practice, not something that is easily picked up from a book or webinar. The best Design Thinking workshops focus on:
The hackathon gives every participant an opportunity to act as both designer and user. Participants go through the entire Design Thinking process, from user interviews to developing a final physical prototype (think pipe cleaners and construction paper) in a fast-paced exercise.
This summer, I facilitated a legal lean sigma workshop, hosted by a law firm and attended by senior partners and their top clients. Over the course of two days, these multi-disciplinary teams analyzed and re-designed critical processes that addressed real-life legal and operational challenges. Clients loved the opportunity to not only learn a new management technique, but to also collaborate with their attorneys to create new and better ways of working together. This was, in my mind, an ultimate act of client service.
[Editor's Note: ALM has a lean law program, with information on budgeting, strategy, work plans, communication, contingency planning and follow-up. For more information, visit www.law.com/lean-adviser/.] *****
Mark Beese is President of Leadership for Lawyers and Founder of Design Thinking Legal. He focuses on helping lawyers become stronger leaders and business developers. He provides Legal Design Thinking Workshops for legal departments and law firms. More information at DesignThinkingLegal.com and LeadershipForLawyers.com.
|ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.