Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It's that time again. As the year comes to a close many firms are beginning the associate review process. Even if your firm does not have a formal review process I recommend that you write a self-evaluation that outlines your achievements and specifies your goals for the coming year. Because I have worked in law firms for over 25 years I have seen a variety of review processes, and whether or not a self-evaluation is part of your firm's process I want to share a few tips I have learned through the years.
You should be familiar of your firm's performance management system. Ask your supervising attorney(s), the professional development department or someone in human resources about the process. There are probably written materials, a slide presentation or a video that explains the steps. Of course, you can ask your colleagues, but they may or may not be fully versed in the details and will share their own opinion of the process. For example, they may think no one reads a self-review so they opt to not complete one. From my experience, not completing a self-review is detrimental when the reviewers begin to formulate their comments.
A self-evaluation is not a recap of the hours you billed or the client matters you worked on. It is an activity in which you look at your progress and development as an attorney. It gives you a chance to comment on the improvements you have made and the skills you have acquired over the past 12 months. You should approach a self-evaluation with the same planning, determination and effort you would put into a client project. There are three goals of the written self-evaluation: 1) to explain your achievements with detail; 2) to comment on the skills you have acquired and those needed to progress; and 3) to clearly articulate your career expectations. Your firm might provide a form to complete, but in case you are doing this on your own the following are the categories and content to include.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.