Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the conversation around remote work. Today the challenge is less about gaining flexibility and a competitive edge. Rather, the conversation has moved to social isolation, self-imposed and forced quarantines and sobering questions about business continuity. This is a real challenge in the face of a viral outbreak that is predicted to affect our communities on a level not seen in decades.
If there's an upside to this unsettling period, it's that the same cloud that irrevocably changed the way companies do business in recent years will now help them navigate through this pandemic. By enabling remote work in response to this crisis, companies will emerge nimbler, more technologically sound and more productive.
As more employees — or all employees in most organizations — work remotely, law firms must employ security best practices to ensure that the extended reliance on the cloud doesn't expose sensitive data or cripple daily operations.
Following is a practical checklist of systems, technologies and processes to consider when evolving your firm for remote work and selecting your cloud technology provider.
There are many remote work strategies and controls that law firms can implement in order to significantly reduce the likelihood of a data breach, limit exposure of sensitive information and maintain security in a virtual office scenario.
All firms relying on a remote workforce should be implementing the following measures in order to ensure the safest possible environment.
The immediate need to support remote work has brought with it an increasingly complex and risky cybersecurity landscape. Thinking proactively about remote work strategy and controls, business continuity and disaster recovery and application management when choosing or monitoring a cloud provider is the best way to prevent cybersecurity breaches before they happen.
*****
Tomas Suros is a technology advocate working at the intersection of IT and client consulting. With AbacusNext since 2004, he currently serves as global director of product marketing, guiding firms through the process of identifying forward-facing technology options and ensuring the successful implementation of a tailored solution. He can be reached at [email protected].
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.