Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Implications of NJ BAIT for Law Firms

By Edward J. Sadowski
December 01, 2020

On Jan. 13, 2020, NJ Governor Phil Murphy signed into law Senate Bill 3246 (S. 3246) establishing the "business alternative income tax" (BAIT), an elective New Jersey business tax regime for pass-through entities (PTEs). Law firms are left wondering if electing to pay the BAIT is the right choice. This article summarizes how the NJ BAIT works, as well as its pros and cons for companies in the industry.

The new law allows pass-through entities such as S corporations and LLCs to elect to pay NJ income tax at the entity level, as a business tax, and to pass through a net amount of Federal taxable income to the owners of the business along with a gross amount of NJ taxable income a NJ tax credit to prevent double taxation in NJ. By passing through a gross amount of NJ taxable income and a credit, the owner is not required to separately pay NJ income tax that could be subject to the SALT limit. Absent this election, the business would pass through a gross amount of Federal and NJ taxable income to the owner, the owner would pay NJ income tax, and the owner's tax payment would be subject to the SALT limit. The BAIT applies to PTE tax years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2020. A detailed article regarding the BAIT tax and its mechanics can be found here.

Below are some key considerations to take into accounting in determining whether your firm may want to elect to pay the BAIT:

|
  1. What makes the NJ BAIT election attractive to law firms?
|
  • The BAIT can be most advantageous where a significant portion of the receipts are sourced to New Jersey and the entity's owners are New Jersey residents. In that case, the residents get a significant advantage with the entity claiming the federal tax deduction for state taxes paid. In this manner, a federal benefit is recognized for the NJ income tax paid rather than having the federal itemized deduction on Schedule A capped at $10,000. In addition, NJ residents partners/shareholders do not have to worry about whether they will be able to claim offsetting credits in home states other than New Jersey.
  • Partnerships, LLC's and consenting New Jersey S-Corporations can make the BAIT election.
  • Single member LLC's and sole proprietorships may not elect the BAIT.
  1. What aspects of the NJ BAIT election may be unattractive to law firms?
|
  • Non-resident credits: The partner or shareholder's resident state, if not NJ, may not allow a resident credit on their individual returns for taxes paid at the entity level in New Jersey.
  • Cash flow: Duplicate BAIT estimated payments are required as are non-resident withholding payments.
  • Cash basis taxpayers must make BAIT payments by year-end to get the federal tax deduction.
  • S-Corporation revenue sourcing methodology for those who elect BAIT may be Cost of Performance as opposed to market sourcing.

The IRS recently released Notice 2020-75. In the Notice, the IRS has announced that it intends to issue proposed regs to clarify that State and local income taxes imposed on and paid by a partnership or an S corporation on its income are allowed as a deduction by the partnership or S corporation in computing its non-separately stated taxable income or loss for the taxable year of payment. For more information on the impact of this on NJ BAIT, see Withum's recent update.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.