Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A recent UK High Court ruling in The Financial Reporting Council Ltd v Frasers Group plc, [2020] EWHC 2607 (Ch) has provided lawyers everywhere with a stark reminder on the scope of privilege for electronic communications: just because an email itself is privileged does not automatically render the documents attached to that email privileged. In other words, despite carefully worded disclaimers and self-proclamations of privilege, if any attorney-client communication or its attachment(s) are shared beyond the initial or intended scope, privilege may be broken.
While this single court decision may be somewhat limited in scope, it highlights longstanding problems with lawyers using email to conduct communications and share confidential documents. Once a lawyer hits send, he or she loses control of the sensitive material the email contains. Some newer messaging platforms widely used in the business world, such as Slack, for example, allow for even more multi-directional conversations as well as the easy sharing of documents, further compounding the challenge of maintaining confidentiality and managing privilege.
But technology itself is not the problem. Rather, the issue is that most in-house legal departments and law firms are not currently using the tools they actually need: sophisticated systems designed for legal work that allow lawyers to better manage permissions and access controls in ways that protect privilege while still enabling timely communication. Some forward-thinking corporate legal departments and law firms have embraced these platforms, but many others either aren't aware they exist or continue to struggle with an overall resistance to using new technology. The pitfalls of email are not going away, however, and lawyers have a professional responsibility to find better solutions for their clients. It's time to realize the benefits of legal tech.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Making partner isn't cheap, and the cost is more than just the years of hard work and stress that associates put in as they reach for the brass ring.