Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Law Firms Need to Look At Partnership Behaviors to Manage Profitability

By Hugh A. Simons
May 01, 2021

There's a paradox at the heart of the legal marketplace: Clients are taking work away from traditional outside counsel and yet premier law firm profitability is at an all-time high. The resolution lies in the number of equity partners. In the decade following the 2007-08 Global Financial Crisis, while the number of in-house lawyers in the United States grew by 50%, the number of U.S.-based lawyers in the Am Law 100 was flat and the number of equity partners declined.

The drop in equity partners didn't come about by stopping promotions (indeed, promotion rates held constant); rather, firms shed their less-profitable practices and partners: they dropped inherently low-leverage flanker practices, pared back international operations, corrected promotion and lateral-hiring mistakes, and transitioned out less commercially capable partners within high-profit practices. Per-partner profitability rose just as would a student's grade point average if one dropped the classes with weaker results. In essence, the effect of external pressures on profitability was offset by changing the composition of partnerships.

Looking at the decade ahead, firms are caught in a pincer. On one side, premier firms are in segment retreat, i.e., serving a segment of the overall market that's shrinking as clients take work away from traditional firms and give it instead to alternative service providers (including in-house counsel) who are growing in number, quality and sophistication of the services they can deliver. On the other, partners have become accustomed to, and expect, profitability growth; failing to grow profits risks having the more commercially capable partners decamp to rivals.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.