Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
If you've ever been in a room at work where someone confidently voiced an opinion you disagreed strongly with, but felt too afraid to speak up, you're not alone. Initially proposed by German political scientist Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann in 1974, "Spiral of Silence" refers to the tendency to remain silent when people feel that their views are in opposition to the majority view on a topic. This silence can have serious ramifications for individuals in a law firm and the firm itself.
For individuals, the "Spiral of Silence" can mean workers don't feel comfortable sharing their opinion or voicing concerns about how they or others are being treated. This allows mistreatment and biases to go unchecked at an individual level and can also result in a secondary spiral in which workers feel they are not able to fully express their personal identity in the workplace. Such employees are stuck in a terrible position, where they feel that expressing their opinions could negatively affect workplace cohesion but saying nothing increases their own feelings of isolation and reduces their sense of genuine belonging.
For law firms, the "Spiral of Silence" means the firm misses the opportunity to address biases and improve workplace conditions. Each time someone offers a perceived minority opinion and receives a negative response, the rest of the group is signalled that they also should not express any diverging opinions. As more vocal views become increasingly encouraged through the feedback loop, differing opinions become even more silenced and institutional bias becomes more entrenched.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.