Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Last month's article, Training the New Crop of Incoming Associates, addressed adult learning theory at a 30,000-foot level. This article delves deeper into what firms can do to support their attorneys who lead training initiatives such as on-boarding new associates, delivering substantive knowledge, designing skill development training or any other aspect of professional development in the legal field. As noted in the previous piece, training lawyers has its own set of issues to overcome.
The number one impediment to getting attorneys to participate in training is time. In the corporate world, oftentimes employees are given dedicated time to complete training. Even in today's virtual world, these entities support employees in disconnecting from work. The Association for Talent Development's 2020 annual industry analysis notes the average number of employee training hours was 55.4 in 2020. Aside from CLE requirements, most firms have no hours requirements for continuing to develop skills and ability in one's career. In fact, it is common for lawyers to cancel attendance last minute or to bring client work into the learning environment.
The opportunity lost due to the billable hour weighs heavily on individuals asked to participate in or conduct training. One way for a firm to support attorneys in taking time to deliver or attend training is to give billable or investment credit for training time. Add a time category for professional development to account for time spent in training. This demonstrates the firms support and allows attorneys to feel more comfortable participating during their work hours.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?