Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
After two years of cancelled, postponed or virtualized versions, in-person retreats are finally back. In late January after the post-holiday Omicron surge, I spoke at a retreat held in a lovely resort in Florida. It was interesting to experience post pandemic preparations and procedures. After the usual planning questions surrounding content and audio-visual needs there was a set of questions around COVID safety and procedures. Aside from those it was business as usual. After a two-year hiatus it's time to refresh ourselves on why and how to run a safe and healthy in-person retreat.
Does your firm want a retreat to reconnect with each other, to tackle business issues, or a combination of both? You need to understand the rationale for the retreat before you start making any arrangements. If top management does not have a clear vision for the retreat, then all the efforts will be misguided, and you will start and stop multiple times. The goal is for people to walk away with a memorable and valuable experience. One goal that should be on the list is for those attorneys who joined during the remote work period meet and break bread with their new colleagues.
One of the goals of the January retreat I participated in was around stress management and finding happiness in the practice. With the ongoing discussions in the media around attorney mental health, it would be proactive and well received by the attendees to have some time devoted to well-being activities.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.