Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Companies announced nearly 90,000 layoffs in March, a significant increase from the prior month and a considerable acceleration from last year, outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas reported recently.
The tech industry, in particular, has been brutally hit, with over 100,000 cuts in 2023, according to the report, and it looks like it will beat 2001, the worst year ever amid the dot-com bust. We are seeing layoffs in the business, tech and within law firms.
No industry is immune from layoffs in a global (and shrinking) economy, and law firms must prepare for this highly delicate situation to hit home. A layoff is a loss of talent, leaving the unintended consequences of mistrust and fear among a company's remaining workers. Handling layoffs from a PR and crisis management perspective requires sensitive, transparent and clear communication.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.