Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
We can expect that soon some enlightened Big Law firms will level with their incoming associates (or at least the corporate ones) and explain that market conditions are such that the firm cannot assure them of the volume of work necessary for their normal growth and development and, accordingly, the firm is offering a stipend (and health insurance) to those who choose to defer for a year. If such is to be expected, then it is to be fervently hoped that many 3Ls will give such deferral serious consideration.
|This consideration probably begins by putting in perspective the notion that deferrals are about firms lowering their costs and thus moving money from the pockets of would-be new associates to those of partners, and that all that constrains firms from deferring is the potential for brand damage on the campuses of elite law schools.
In reality, the cost savings from deferrals are relatively modest. The meaningful cost-reduction levers are things like: transitioning out the off-track and non-equity partner lawyers who aren't going to make equity partner but who are retained as executional capacity when market demand is strong; outplacing newly-promoted partners who are not showing the requisite business development nous and lateral partners who've failed to deliver their purported business case; pulling back from under-performing new office and practice initiatives; and, moving on more senior partners whose comp has drifted upward with tenure and now exceeds their practices' economic worth. Further, the savings from deferrals that would benefit calendar year 2023 financials — a period that matters disproportionately to firms trying to avoid a second down year of partner comp — are especially small potatoes given that it entails barely three months of salaries.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.