Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Should Law Firms Make Pass-Through Entity Tax Elections?
Law firms are often structured as pass-through entities (e.g., partnerships, LLCs, S-Corporations) due to traditional prohibitions against practicing law in corporate form. As such, in states that conform to the federal income tax treatment of pass-through entities, law firms are not subject to state income taxes — law firm owners (e.g., partners, members, shareholders) are subject to state income tax on their respective distributive shares of the firm's income.
The Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) included a $10,000 cap on state and local tax deductions. As a result, the owners of pass-through entities are limited in the amount of state and local taxes they can deduct on their Federal income tax return. In response, over 25 states have enacted pass-through entity taxes. These pass-through entity tax regimes allow the owners of law firms to preserve their state and local tax deduction on their income from the law firm.
Generally, pass-through entity taxes operate by creating an entity level tax on the law firm. The firm then claims an ordinary and necessary business expense deduction for the entity level state income tax. As such, the state income taxes are essentially paid on a "pre-tax" basis. In order to prevent double taxation, states either provide:
- A credit to the owners on their personal income tax return for their share of the tax paid by the law firm; or,
- A subtraction from state taxable income for income subject to the state's pass-through entity tax
While state pass-through entity tax regimes may provide substantial benefit for law firm owners who pay more than $10,000 in state and local income taxes on their law firm income, there are many pitfalls to be considered before making a pass-through entity tax election. Considerations include (but are not limited to):
- Does the state offer a fully refundable credit, or is any unused credit limited to a carryforward to subsequent tax years?
- Is the credit available to the owner equal to their share of the tax paid at the entity level?
- Will a resident state allow a credit for taxes paid to a nonresident state's pass-through entity tax?
- Will a tax-benefit rule apply to state income tax refunds?
- Is the pass-through entity tax election made on an "all-or-nothing" basis, or can individual partners elect in or out of the pass-through entity tax based on their specific facts and circumstances?
- Is the pass-through entity tax base on the law firm owner's entire income from the law firm, or only income derived from sources within that particular state?
- When do estimated payments need to be made under a pass-through entity tax election, and when are those payments deductible?
- What is the process for making the election, what are the applicable deadlines, and is the election revocable?
*****
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.