Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Last month, one of my favorite commentators in the legal content space, Kevin O'Keefe, posted some musings on LinkedIn about the place of legal blogging in the legal publishing pantheon. O'Keefe, the founder of LexBlog and writer of the blog "Real Lawyers Have Blogs," is a big proponent of legal blogs — as am I. In the post, he asked whether legal blogging should be considered part of legal publishing and concluded that it should: "Legal blogs are not the same as the mediums used for legal publishing in days past, but blogs may represent legal publishing — or at least a part of legal publishing today. Technology, the internet — and soon AI — may redefine what we call legal publishing." (You can read his LinkedIn post here.)
I couldn't agree more with his conclusion that blogs had become authoritative sources for legal content, allowing lawyers to showcase their expertise and provide legal insights in an accessible format.
But I was brought up short by this aside in his post: "Blogs, in their junk form, are written by legal marketers without regard to legal information and posted to a website to get search rankings and mislead the public."
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.