Call 855-808-4530 or email GroupSales@alm.com to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Every law firm wants their clients to have exceptional experiences of their services, from intake through invoice delivery because client service is often the key differentiating factor in winning new business as well as retaining and expanding existing.
Client service, however, has changed over the years. It's no longer a story of handing clients prestigious, 50-yard-line football tickets; rather, much of what clients consider to be client service today has to do with data and security.
In fact, year over year, the ACC Chief Legal Officers' survey shows that CLOs site security and data management as their number one priority when working with outside counsel; and as security threats evolve, so too the areas for which law firms should be scrutinizing for heightened security as part of that business-critical client service.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at customercare@alm.com or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?