Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Crafting a Crisis Communications and Mitigation Strategy for Law Firms
Having a crisis communications and mitigation strategy in place is essential for law firms and businesses of all sizes to be prepared for unexpected situations that could jeopardize their reputation. Think of it like insurance — you hope you never have to use it but are relieved to have it when you need it. In crafting this strategy, companies need to weigh various factors such as the nature of the crisis, the values and expectations of their stakeholders, and the potential impact on their reputation. These considerations will guide the decision on whether to take the traditional route of apologizing and making amends or to embrace the escalation strategy, which is standing firm on the company's values despite the potential backlash.
In traditional public relations 101, the classic method of crisis communications has been to maintain neutrality while demonstrating the three Rs: Recognize the mistake, show Remorse, and act swiftly to Resolve. However, as the dynamics of social media and stakeholder expectations have shifted, there is a growing debate on whether taking a solid position, even at the risk of backlash, can be more effective in building a lasting law firm brand legacy.
The Classic Approach: Neutrality and the Three Rs
Traditionally, crisis communication has focused on maintaining a neutral stance, emphasizing the importance of the recognize, remorse and resolution strategy. Acknowledging the issue transparently is the first step. Whether it's addressing a conflict of interest or ethical lapse, a corporate scandal, or a policy failure, recognizing the problem openly demonstrates accountability.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?