Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In many simple cases, a partner's tax basis in their partnership interest (so-called "outside basis") will equal his pro rata share of the partnership's tax basis in its assets (so-called "inside basis"). However, there are various transactions that may cause a disparity between inside basis and outside basis to occur.
For example, if a person purchases a partnership interest at a valuation that is higher than the partnership's inside basis, the purchaser's outside basis will be greater than his share of the partnership's inside basis.
In such a situation, if the partnership sells an asset and allocates the gain pro rata to its partners, the purchaser would be allocated too much tax gain compared to his economic profit. To ameliorate this result, the tax code allows a partnership to make an election (a so-called "section 754 election") to increase the tax basis of its assets with respect to the purchaser in an amount equal to the difference between the purchaser's outside basis in the partnership and his share of the partnership's inside basis in its assets (a so-called "section 743 adjustment").
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.