Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Robert Frost once wrote; “Home is a place that when you have to go there, they have to take you in.” That prose speaks volumes to the level of loyalty family members feel toward one another. There is an implied familial contract that obliges parents, siblings and children to always find a place for family members. For years, there had been a similar implied social contract between employers and employees that suggested an inviolable relationship.
Law firms, perhaps more than most organizations, adhered to that principle. The level of convivial affinity runs deep. Some partners refer to themselves proudly as “lifers” of their respective firms. Their firms were perceived to be existential to their professional identity.
Perhaps only outpaced by Japanese corporations in connection with loyalty to their employees, law firms seek to nurture long-term relations in all of their connections. You see it in how they treat their former employees as well, referring to them as “alumni” or “friends” of the firm. Laudable, indeed, but no longer realistic.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?