Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The increasing competition in the legal industry highlights the importance of differentiation and adding value beyond the work product. Face-to-face interactions with clients are a critical component in differentiation because they provide the opportunity to understand better the nuances of clients' businesses, develop deeper relationships, and drive productive collaboration.
Under this guiding principle, Baker Donelson spent the past five years emphasizing the important role client visits play in providing exceptional client service. In response to the realities of the legal industry, including changing market dynamics and increased competition, the firm was determined to put a more singular focus on in-person client interactions.
Toward that end, in 2016, Baker Donelson launched a Client Visit Initiative that leveraged training, software, and gamification and resulted in visits to more than 2,650 clients. The in-person interactions afforded the attorneys a deeper understanding of the clients' goals and personal interests. They also provided opportunities to enhance service delivery based on the feedback the clients shared. Firms of any size can apply the fundamentals of this Client Visit Initiative to enhance the value they provide to clients.
The key driver for the client visit initiative was for attorneys to increase the number of meaningful face-to-face interactions with clients outside the course of normal business. That focused the firm's efforts in three areas: 1) increasing the frequency of client visits; 2) improving the quality of those interactions; and 3) tracking the visits to better support follow up.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.