Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Lawyers and law firms are exhorted constantly to listen to the voice of the client! They are told this by the economic engineers who drive the legal profession — General Counsel — on panels, in media interviews and through legal industry surveys. Business development is easy — just listen up, lawyers!
And firms work tirelessly to heed this advice, investing in surveys, and client feedback programs and speaking opportunities and blogs and alumni programs and CLEs. Once information is obtained, law firms and lawyers invest even more to respond to these perceived client needs — creating greater efficiency with artificial intelligence, alternative fee arrangements, innovation, and so on.
At the end of the day, a lot of noise is created in the effort to hear the voice of the client. We propose that while these efficiencies and innovations in law are valuable, the clients keep asking for something different: a lawyer who deeply understands their business and their specific issue — at the time they need it. When push comes to shove — your clients want an expert in a focused, unique and specific problem that may be industry specific.
But don't take our word it, take theirs. In a 2017 General Counsel Up-At-Night Report of more than 200 general counsel and other in-house legal decision makers, jointly produced and published by Morrison & Forrester and ALM Intelligence, 85% of respondents hire outside counsel for the legal expertise. General counsel want the expert; the lawyer who deeply understands their business, the challenge, and has the expertise from which to draw upon to navigate and resolve their issue. See the graphic below.
Now that we've heard the client, where does the opportunity exist to adjust to their needs? For tomorrow's rainmakers this means securing a stronghold in market by clearly defining an area of expertise and carving out a niche — one of the basic principles of building a sustainable law practice, albeit with increasing importance every day. Long gone are the days of “general practice” law firms and lawyers, where clients call their “trusted advisor” for any legal issue because they know the lawyer will handle the work or figure it out … unless, that is, you are willing to accept lower rates for handling more basic legal work. (This commoditized work will eventually be replaced by alternative legal service providers, like a LegalZoom, but that is a topic for a different article.)
In addition to the benefit of securing a place in an increasingly competitive legal landscape, the value of lawyers carving out a niche extends well beyond its appeal to clients. It enables lawyers to command a higher rate, offering the lawyer the opportunity of sustainable financial success and security. (Remember that 89% of general counsel choose to handle the work in-house when cost and efficiency are key drivers.) A niche practice also makes lawyers more marketable as they consider new opportunities. The BCG Attorney Search 2017 State of the American Lateral Law Firm Legal Market Report revealed that a significant feature of the changing legal job market is the “increasing demand for specialist attorneys and the decreasing demand for generalist attorneys.” Moreover, the marketability of the “quality of an attorney's 'niche' practice area experience” has become more valuable than the quality of their education. (Let's pause here to that sink in for a minute.)
So for the lawyer who is thinking about their future — a future that includes a sustaining practice of law that will carry the family through the course of a legal career, the future where a they practice with passion the kind of legal work they love (not just what another lawyer shares) — the next generation of lawyers shouldn't be distracted by the noise but should focus on what is within their control. Establishing an expertise that aligns with a need in the market — carving out a niche — will position lawyers to achieve a sustaining and fulfilling practice of law by responding to the needs of their clients.
*****
Jennifer Simpson Carr, Senior Consultant at Knapp Marketing, is a business strategist who guides firms and attorneys in establishing competitive advantage and winning new business in competitive markets. She has more than a decade of experience leading business development strategies at small and mid-size law firms, primarily in the Am Law 200, throughout the United States. Amy Knapp is a business development and marketing strategist with over 20 years of experience in the professional services industry. Amy's firm, Knapp Marketing, develops re-branding and business development campaigns for law firms. Known for her work in digital marketing, Amy's projects have included website and brand repositioning, firm-wide and practice-specific business development campaigns, one-on-one business development coaching and niche practice development.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?