Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Ask the Right Questions, Get the Right Hire Via Remote Interviewing
During this unprecedented time firm leaders, practice managers and hiring partners are asked to interview candidates to replace attorneys who have left or to grow their bench in certain areas via remote technology. Recruiting is a costly expense and should be managed with an eye to the bottom line. Effective interviewing can help control costs and is a skill that requires thought, preparation and practice. Though attorneys have experience interviewing clients, finding the right person who fits into a firm's culture requires a different tactic. The following are techniques and important guidelines that will help an attorney conduct interviews that are efficient and help to lead to quality candidates for hire. The following applies to virtual interviewing as well as in person.
Before recruiting begins and certainly before the interviews, determine if the stakeholders have discussed the position. Can the team articulate qualifications that are needed, both professionally and personally? Reviewing both will allow the interviewer to develop a line of questions that will streamline the interview.
Professional qualifications should be easy to determine as these depend upon what is needed for the position. Sometimes this step is skipped because work is overflowing and there is a sense of desperation to get the opening filled. This should not be overlooked because outlining what is needed might be different than what is wanted. For example, the team might need someone who is excellent at writing tax treatises, but they want someone who can speak at client CLE seminars. You might be able to find someone who can do both, but which is more important within the timeframe to get client work done? The attorneys who will be working with this new hire should all agree upon what professional skills are necessary to be successful at the firm.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?