Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
There was a lot of attention paid to "client outreach" at the start of the pandemic and the days that followed. Some of the wiser legal and business professionals were opportunitists, viewing the constraints as forcing functions for creativity and a chance to demonstrate their commitment to being an excellent business partner.
Whether you were in the "batten down the hatches and sit tight" or the "Carpe Diem!" camp, now is the time to improve the ways in which you capture — and use — the richly valuable information that comes from listening to the voice of the client.
Many law firms and legal departments actually did a pretty decent job of maintaining helpful connections to clients using a variety of methods like virtual meetings, email, alerts, and even resource centers. Those things are good for marketing and business development and help us deliver client value, but they don't necessarily allow us to elicit the voice of the client in the most immediate and impactful ways.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?