Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Thought leadership or content marketing has gained attention as an effective way to establish credibility, generate awareness of a lawyer's capabilities and promote an attorney's unique expertise. (The term content is used broadly to describe any and all information produced by the law firm and delivered to the client or published in public mediums. This includes newsletters, client alerts, blog posts, white papers, speaking engagements, interviews, advisories and memos, training programs and any other information which is intended to inform and educate clients and their business line managers.) Done well, it can also generate inquiries and lead to new engagements. However, not all content written by your lawyers is perceived as valuable. In fact, some content can actually detract from the client-attorney relationship and be seen as irritating. This article describes a model to help your lawyers evaluate the relative value of the information they are sending to their clients and help you communicate the importance of delivering value in their written communications to clients.
Content can be evaluated by the value or benefit it delivers to clients and prospective clients. Think of content as being on a continuum of value ranging from negative in which the communication presents no new information, is delivered late or is difficult to read to, on the other extreme, highly valuable information delivered timely. This latter category of content is unique in its analysis, relevant to its readers and delivered well enough in advance that readers can take full advantage of the information.
More explicitly, the continuum of value ranges from the simple reporting of information (such as a proposed legislation or a case decision) to a business or industry relevant analysis and/or advice to the forecasting of potential developments. The further the information is on the continuum toward a forecast that helps clients avoid problems, reveal new solutions or identify new opportunities, the more valuable that content will be to clients (or prospective clients).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.