Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
From less than subtle political repute in recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions, to headlines of lawsuits and slashed diversity efforts, corporate diversity efforts are being called into question by many actors. Oftentimes, claims of the potential illegality of these efforts are raised. Are corporate diversity efforts really discriminatory and how are they impacting the daily operations of business? As a former director of diversity at a global law firm, I know the truth of what corporate diversity work actually is and it goes much further than what many assume when they think about diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in the workplace.
For many, the mere mention of workplace DEI often results in visions of mandatory patronizing educational programs, policies prioritizing increased racial representation above all else, and overarching themes of shame and blame. These approaches are not effective, and perhaps most importantly do not accurately reflect the approach of DEI professionals that have been my trusted colleagues over my 15-plus years engaged in this work. Below are examples of effective operational impact and change led by diversity professionals that benefit all members of the workplace.
Review, compensation and promotion processes are often difficult to navigate, with only a select few in management with sight lines on how processes critical to advancement play out in reality. However, sight lines don't always equal insight or understanding as to how the processes impact the workforce. Through access to large scale organizational data sets, DEI professionals audit outcomes across personal and organizational categories to identify where efforts may be working effectively and/or as designed. In my work, I've identified and raised awareness of previously undiscovered trends disproportionately impacting populations by certain departments or locations, tenure, length of leaves, methods of hire and even educational background.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Making partner isn't cheap, and the cost is more than just the years of hard work and stress that associates put in as they reach for the brass ring.