Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sam, a litigation partner at a large law firm, was absolutely brilliant in the courtroom. His skills at navigating complex legal issues, incisive cross-examination abilities, and impeccable oratory skills made him a superstar among his peers.
Yet, for all his courtroom prowess, Sam faced an ironic struggle. Despite being a brilliant litigator, Sam's book of business was not what one would expect of someone with his track record.
His Achilles' heel? Networking — or, more specifically, his philosophy on maintaining his professional network.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A follow up to the article on a briefing in 'Kousisis v. United States' before the U.S. Supreme Court that considers the viability of the fraudulent inducement theory. Arguments before the Court took place on Dec. 9, and the authors provide an update.
Live streaming has evolved significantly and is a widespread phenomenon for retail, gaming, and influencers but is now providing competitive advantages for leading accounting, management consulting, and other professional services firms and B-to-B companies looking to build their brands and increase business.
A novel legal self-help technique to secure artificial intelligence data and programs is known as Poisoning AI. This technique involves modifying the AI algorithm to intentionally produce specific erroneous results.
In a recent decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addressed the issue of whether purchasing market competitors’ search engine keyword terms, known as “conquesting,” constitutes trademark infringement.