Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
At the beginning of February when I returned from Legalweek NY (it was great to see some of our readers and Board members there), I was lamenting to a friend (who is not in the legal or marketing industry) the fact that I didn't leave myself time for lunch while scheduling meetings and attending and moderating sessions. She said, right away, "Why didn't you make them lunch meetings?" I was dumbstruck. "I…I don't know," was all that I could stammer in reply. So it struck me: Is the lunch meeting still a thing? Is it a lost art? A lost opportunity?
"Lunch used to be where business was done," says Anthony Davies, Chief Revenue Officer for Forrest Solutions. "When we used to be in the office all five days, we would look forward to getting out, to pop out for lunch."
So now that we're back in the office for at least a couple days a week (for most of us), will we once again take advantage of that opportunity to connect with clients and colleagues?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?