Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Ethical Obligations and Risks of Engaging a Temporary Attorney
It is not uncommon for practitioners and law firms to employ the services of temporary (or contract) attorneys as the need may arise in contemporary practice. Employers often turn to temporary lawyers to address a variety of needs including workload variations, special projects, matters requiring a unique or particular skillset, and general assistance with such tasks as document review and the drafting of legal memoranda, among other things. As one federal court explained, "economics is the principal reason for emergence of lawyer temping because it permits a firm to service client needs during particularly busy periods by engaging an experienced attorney, without incurring the expense of hiring a permanent employee." See, Carlson v. Xerox, 596 F. Supp. 2d 400, 409 (D. Conn. 2009) (internal citations omitted). This article discusses the ethical obligations and associated risks that flow from engaging the services of a temporary attorney, including areas such as billing for services and adequate disclosure to clients.
Temporary Lawyers In Context
A generally accepted definition of the term "temporary lawyer" includes an attorney hired "to work on a single matter or a number of different matters, depending upon the firm's staffing needs and whether the temporary attorney has special expertise not otherwise available to the firm." See, Newby v. Enron, 586 F.Supp. 2d 732, 783 n 64 (S.D. Tex. 2008) (Observing that the hiring of a contract or temporary attorney is a common practice in law firms today); see also Takeda Chemical Industries v. Mylan Laboratories, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19614 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2007) ("In complex litigation, contract attorneys are routinely used by well-established law firms who supervise their work."). Temporary attorneys are typically employed for a "limited period or purpose" and do not include someone who "is a part time employee of a firm or one who is employed full time but without contemplation of permanent employment, who works only for the employing firm." See, Colo. Formal Ethics Op. 105 (May 22, 1999).
Billing Considerations for Temporary Lawyers' Services
In order to bill a client for the services of a temporary lawyer, a law firm may either bill for the work as "legal services" akin to that of a partner or associate or an expense or disbursement. With respect to the former option, the firm is permitted to realize a profit for the temporary lawyer's work, insofar as it can add "a surcharge to the costs" provided the "total charge represents a reasonable fee for services provided to the client." See, ABA Comm. on Ethics and Prof'l Resp., Formal Op. 00-420 (Nov. 29, 2000). As to the latter, when such services are billed as an expense or disbursement, the "client may be charged only the cost directly associated with the services, including expenses incurred by the billing lawyer to obtain and provide the benefit of the contract lawyer's services." In order to add a surcharge to the costs under this option, the client must give her consent.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Role and Responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?